BonJour’s Abductivist Reply to Skepticism
نویسنده
چکیده
According to the abductivist reply to skepticism, the continuity, coherence and repeatable regularities found in our sensory experiences cry out for explanation. Abductivists claim the best explanation of these features of our experience is that they reflect objective regularities in the world. They maintain that the hypothesis that our sense experiences are caused by objects having roughly the characteristics we ordinarily take them to have constitutes a better explanation of our sensory experience than any skeptical hypothesis involving evil demons or brains in vats. The explanatory superiority of the commonsensical hypothesis, abductivists contend, renders belief in it epistemically justified and belief in the falsity of skeptical
منابع مشابه
The theoretical diagnosis of skepticism
Radical skepticism about the external implies that no belief about the external is even prima facie justified. A theoretical reply to skepticism has four stages. First, show which theories of epistemic justification support skeptical doubts (show which theories, given other reasonable assumptions, entail skepticism). Second, show which theories undermine skeptical doubts (show which theories, g...
متن کاملSkeptical Theism and Moral Skepticism
Skeptical theists purport to undermine evidential arguments from evil by appealing to the fact that our knowledge of goods, evils, and their interconnections is signi cantly limited. Michael J. Almeida and Graham Oppy have recently argued that skeptical theism is unacceptable because it results in a form of moral skepticism which rejects inferences that play an important role in our ordinary mo...
متن کاملCausality and dispersion : a reply to
Classical dispersion relations are derived from a time-asymmetric constraint. I argue that the standard causal interpretation of this constraint plays a scientifically legitimate role in dispersion theory, and hence provides a counterexample to the causal skepticism advanced by John Norton and others. Norton ([???]) argues that the causal interpretation of the time-asymmetric constraint is an e...
متن کاملInvestigating the relationship between temper and professional skepticism in auditors
Background & Aim: Audit professionals’ skepticism is one of the behavioral and personality traits that is effective in reducing agency costs, audit quality, and enhancing public confidence. On this basis, it is very important to know the factors contributing to enhancement or degradation of professional skepticism. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between temperamen...
متن کامل• Thinking Styles and Professional Skepticism in Auditing (Theory of Mental Self-Government)
Thinking styles have an influence on information processing, judgment, and decision-making. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of thinking styles on the professional skepticism.Thinking styles include the legislator, the executive, the judge, the general, the partial, the introspective, the extroverted, the conservative and the free thinking.The statistical populat...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007